Rule #1: Care. Really, truly care.

First and foremost, be client-centered.  This seems obvious, and it is, but so few programs actually adhere to it. So, I'll repeat it: Be client-centered.  From the moment your client first walks in the door or calls you on the phone, they should feel like they are the reason your organization exists - because they are.  Greet them by name, but be thoughtful of their privacy.  Make eye contact.  Find out what their needs are before you decide what's best for them.  Empower them.  Design your programs (and in some cases, even your office space) with the client's experience in mind.  (We'll talk more about that in Rule #2.)

Secondly - and this is a very close second - be staff-centered.  Without clients your organization would not be necessary, but without your staff you would just be an empty building.  Not to get too metaphysical on you, but think of clients as being the soul of your organization and the staff as the body.  The body can move and operate on its own, but without a soul it has no reason do so.  

I'm a firm believer that supported staff do better work.  If someone does good work, tell them, both publically and privately.  Mention it in a staff meeting, send them a thank-you card to their home.  Remember birthdays.  Ask how they're doing.  Ask how you can help them.  Don't always say "no."  Be reasonably flexible.  

Showing your clients and your staff that your organization cares about them builds the relationship that business so often leave out.  Notorious offenders like AT&T, Comcast, and Wal-Mart spend millions of dollars each year trying to repair broken relationships with their customers.  I've had representatives from AT&T & Samsung both reach out to me personally on Twitter in response to complaints - that means someone is paid to sit and crawl the Twitter feed looking for complaints.  That's a lot of scrubbing to do. 

 

Inspired to Greatness

A few times each year I attended conferences related to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS in the United States.  Though the title and focus may differ, they each host a similar feel.  Inspiring success stories from San Francisco and New York, heart-warming tales of individuals who have overcome insurmountable odds, organizations giving away pencils in an attempt to convince you to hire them for capacity building assistance.  I always leave feeling armed with a notebook full of hastily-written ideas and a renewed motivation to enact change in my own community.  

But during the plane ride home, as I thumb through all the glossy materials I picked up in the exhibit hall, I almost invariably find myself wondering "Can't we can do better than this?"  Fancy flyers don't make a program successful.  Monogramed pens don't make patients feel comfortable coming to an HIV clinic.  Free t-shirts don't pay for expensive medications. 

Now we arrive at what most conference attendees really want to learn about: What does make the difference?  What makes a "good" program become a "great" program?  How can we enact desperately-needed change without spending any money?

Over the next few days I am goign to post my "Five Rules to Greatness" in the workplace.  Whether you're a local charity or a industry leader, these tips will help your organization become the best version of itself.   As a preview, here's the list:

Rule #1: Care.  Really, truly care.

Rule #2: Focus on what you do best.

Rule #3: Be data-driven.

Rule #4: Listen.

Rule #5: Collaborate.
 

 

epilogue

[NOTE: my blog has still "officially" been moved to posterous. this is just the epilogue to these posts.]

just re-read some of my old posts - its always interesting to read what i've written in the past. i feel it appropriate to write a final chapter to the story of my posts here on blogger.

it's amazing what can happen in the space of one year, and darn near staggering when you step back and look at 5- or 10-year increments. ten years ago i was a sophomore in college, working at a roofing company, and had just decided to major in psychology. five years ago i was about to graduate with my master's degree but was unemployed. one year ago i was trying to gain my footing in a new job and had just signed a contract to build a house. two years ago the US was fluttering with excitement as barack obama was elected president; tomorrow is the midterm elections, and the US is a mix of apathy, despondence, and fury at the current state of affairs.

in all cases, be they public or private, we are quick to judge the outcome by our present status. i have previously posted on my tendency (like many others) to seek refuge in religion during difficult times. and in doing so, i illustrate the lack of foresight and [often irrational] anxiety that is innate in my humanness.

a lot of my blog posts have been about the journey of figuring out "who" i am (i guess that was how blogs got started in the first place, right?). i haven't figured it out yet, of course, and i don't think i ever will...or that anyone really ever can figure it out, as we are always growing and changing and evolving. (props to heraclitus for figuring that out some 2500 years ago.)

even if i may not be able to exactly articulate 'who' i am, i do know that i am increasingly disinclined to describe or label myself as anything which i do not entirely embrace. two particularly poignant examples in the present sociocultural climate would be political and religious affiliation. groups in these particular realms expect their members to agree with and embrace certain tenets, or descriptors, that the group leadership has identified as being "this is who we are and what we believe." (see: Oklahoma Republican Party's Platform. for the record, religions as a whole aren't quite as bent on forming in-groups/out-groups , hence their many denominations.)

in my youth i was comfortable finding groups that were "close" or a "near fit" to how i saw the world and declaring my membership with them. labels color the world in black and white binary and allow us to simplify everything so that we don't have to spend time or brain power wrestling with the gray areas of life. us vs. them, right vs wrong, good vs evil, it's all very efficient.

i'm guilty of using labels to describe myself and others, and i'm trying to stop. i'm also trying to be accepting of people who are comfortable identifying with groups that are "near fits" for them. i really enjoy intellectual dialogue (and, when blogging, monologue), and i hope we can agree to disagree about something - it'd be kind of a shame if we felt the same about everything.

okay, i think i'm officially out of thoughts for this blog. thanks google, it's been a blast. (p.s. - i love gmail & google docs!) now, on to posterous!

moving, but not deleting

an FYI for anyone that may still subscribe to my blog - i'm having a bit of a re-interest in blogging, but i'm moving to posterous.

you can continue to read/follow/share on my new blog at posterous.com/andymoore.

Need vs. Need

Many of you know that I work in the HIV/AIDS community in Oklahoma, a state that has developed a reputation for not being particularly embracing to people of alternative lifestyles or perspectives. I spend much of my time designing programs to improve access to treatment and care, enhance education and prevention measures, and perhaps most of all - how to garner increased funding for our programs. As is the case with most non-profits and governmental entities, I am often faced with the reality that the need is great while the resources are few. So, I set out to do what you always do when requesting more funding: Demonstrate the level of our need.

That's where things get sticky. Oklahoma's economy is closely tied to its tangible resources, namely oil, natural gas, and wheat. While it initially seemed that the global economic crisis might not have a substantial impact this state, Monday's announcement that Oklahoma City Public Schools will be eliminating 131 teachers and administrators and closing three elementary schools in an effort to trim the district's budget by $17 million cast a decidedly pessimistic light on the state's ability to weather this storm unscathed. Along with the Department of Education, most state agencies are looking for ways to cut program spending, including programs that directly affect our clientèle. The response from all levels of the Oklahoma HIV/AIDS community has been "No way! We need this money! HIV/AIDS is still a big deal!"

This is true. Every nine-and-a-half minutes someone in the US is infected with HIV [Video]. Here in Oklahoma, there are an estimated 4,605 people living with HIV/AIDS, nearly half of which live in the Oklahoma City metropolitan statistical area. Yes indeed, this is still a big deal.

According to UNAIDS, Sub-Saharan Africa has around 25 million people living with HIV/AIDS. They've had 2 million new cases reported in just one year - that's more than the total number of cases in the US. And in some African countries, close to 30% of the population is HIV-positive. Infection rates in southeast Asia continue to climb, especially in places like Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, China, and Thailand. So, that's obviously a big deal as well. One could argue that the situation in Africa is worse than the situation in Oklahoma. But how much worse?

I find myself struggling with this issue on a regular basis. How do we determine where to direct our resources? Should we develop a global Level of Need rating system and apply it to all countries? (Hans Rosling has already collected that data; even on a logarithmic scale the United States' need pales in comparison to Sub-Saharan Africa.) How do we decide how much funding should go to prevention and how much should go to treatment? Or, would we be better off to fund something else altogether, like HIV testing, access to fresh produce or iodized salt, mosquito nets, needle exchange programs, education, housing, economic development, etc.? (Watch this video for a much more academic conversation on this question.)

The answer, I suppose, is simply "Yes." Yes, we should support efforts to prevent, identify, and treat HIV both domestically and overseas. Yes, we should support efforts to reduce poverty and increase education and protect people from malaria-carrying mosquitoes. Yes, this is a big deal, and we should fight it. Fight it in lots of places, with lots of tools.

stagnation on everest

there have been dozens of moments since my last post in which i felt inspired to blog, but like millions of others, i've moved away from blogger to more interactive services such as facebook and twitter. somewhere along the way i apparently decided that i can express myself just as adequately in 140 characters as i can in a long blog post. and perhaps for the most part that's true. but i also realized that its not just my creative production that has been truncated; it's my inspiration as well. lengthy, well-developed theories and postulates and theses on relationships and god and love have given way to abbreviated statements of observation designed to be consumed and discarded.

this realization came to me as i sat in my office, staring at my desk, seemingly waiting for the next fleeting moment of inspiration/motivation/need/request/information to strike my brain and jolt me into action. i've become so conditioned to simply respond to external stimuli that i have noticed that my skill in accessing and utilizing my intrinsic motivations has decreased. apparently, as you get better at reacting, you get worse at simply acting. i feel as thought my ability to have original thought (call it inspiration or motivation or whatever) has been compromised. i long for the days when my mind was full of ideas and my heart was filled with excitement at making those ideas reality.

at my core i will always be a scientist, and so naturally my first inclination is to figure out why and/or how this changed occurred. was it the long, cold, dark winter? is it an increase in my intake of caffeine or sugar or calories in general? is it simply a neurological shift that occurred slowly and is just now noticeable? is it that the genius who lives in my walls has gotten lame?

i don't have an answer to those questions. after several days of dwelling on it, i decided that figuring out the cause doesn't always have to come before working on the solution. so, i've started working on identifying and testing solutions. i've been watching TEDTalks during lunch, spending scheduled time in silent introspection, and talking to people whose opinion and insight i value and trust. i'm not there yet, but it's a start.

i know i can excel at doing the day-to-day requirements of my job - just like i always knew i could pass any test in school. if my boss gives me a task, i get it done quickly, without errors, and great quality. that's easy; that's the minimum required. i'm not looking to just do the minimum. hell, i'm not satisfied with B+ level work. i want an A.

i think this is the problem i've run into with most of my jobs. my employer doesn't expect much from me; at least, they expect much less than what i know i'm capable of, and therefore meeting their expectations isn't really a challenge. i'm thankful that my current employer gives me great latitude in my position. i may not see or speak with my boss for days (or weeks) at a time, and its generally up to me to keep our programs running smoothly. and they do, because, again, that's the minimum.

i want to be the best. i want to design programs that deliver world-class care and services to our clients. i want my staff to be the most engaged, proficient, and satisfied staff possible. i want other agencies to look to us for inspiration and partnership and support not because we're the largest, but because we're doing the best work. i want to do all this because our clients deserve it and because it needs to be done.

this is my everest.

r.t. is on t.v.

behold my mother's uncle (does that make him my great-uncle?), r. thurman cagle, in his television debut.  my cousins still drive from okc to gilmer to purchase their vehicles from this dealership.  guess you stick with what works.

2009 OKC Arthritis Walk

Hey everyone, the 2009 OKC Arthritis Walk is coming up!  Please come join our team as we raise money and walk in support of arthritis research, treatment, and education.  Last year we did the walk in College Station and it was encouraging and a lot of fun, and we are both looking forward to this year!  

Some quick event details:

When: Saturday, May 30th, 2009 (Time TBA.  It will probably be in the morning, though.)

Where: Stars & Stripes Park, Oklahoma City (link goes to Google Map)

What: Choose from a 1- or 3-mile walk route and enjoy the food, fun, and festivities!  

Sweet, I wanna walk with you guys!  How do I sign up? Go to ourteam page and join our team!

I live out of town but want to come in for the Walk.  Where should I stay? Very exciting!  Well, we have room in our apartment for a couple of folks, and there are several hotels near the park, as well as others near our apartment.   

Aw shucks, I can't make it this year.  Can I still donate to your team?  Of course!  You can go to our team page and donate thru the secure site, or you can send us money directly and we'll add your name to our donor list.  (Yes, it's all tax-deductible.)

I heard that last year your team had some sweet shirts.  Where can I get one? We have a CafePress store where you can buy arthritis-related apparel that we've created, and we have new designs being posted all the time.  All the proceeds go toward supporting arthritis research, treatment, and education.  (If things go really well, maybe we'll even start our own 501(c)3 someday!)

What about your blog?  Is that thing still active? Yes, we still have our blog (JOINTogether4RA.blogspot.com ), though we admit that we've been neglecting it the last few months. However, we've made some new friends in Blogger and are experiencing a renewed interest in documenting our journey and experience with RA.  Stay tuned for an updated design and new content!

If you have any questions about anything, please don't hesitate to write or call.  We are seriously excited about this year's walk and hope you can make it.  As people begin to sign up and we begin to get an idea about how many people will be attending, we will send out further emails with any additional info about things such as afterparties, cookouts, etc.  

the wonders of google

i know i haven't posted anything in a while...working 3 jobs and having a new puppy don't seem to allow much time for blogging.  

and so, in the tradition of brevity, here's a link to a great little article about some of the handy/cool/wonderful things google gives us each day.  for free.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/26/technology/personaltech/26pogue.html?_r=1&em

i didn't know about the flu watch, but it is seriously handy/cool.  

book club - week 1

for several weeks/months gabriele and i have both noticed that we've been having the same conversation with several of our friends, colleagues, and clients regarding the face of the Church in our world. we're almost never the ones that have brought up the topic, and sometimes we haven't even really said anything at all before the conversation turns towards it, but it is increasingly apparent that we're not the only ones dwelling on the issue.

we thought it might be cool if everyone got together and had the conversation together, in the same place, at the same time. and so, last week we started meeting with some friends to continue the discussion. since we had recently read rob bell's book velvet elvis: repainting the christian faith and felt like it was also saying the same sort of thing, we figured a good way to start would be to have a little book club.

our first time together was simply four of us eating chips and guacamole and queso, telling stories about college pranks and laughing and complaining and struggling and sharing our experiences in the church. after about three hours we actually started discussing the book itself. it was a wonderful time.

the essence of the conversation the first night was largely about how the Church has really messed things up for jesus. he came preaching a gospel of love and it's been turned into a gospel of rules; selflessness and humility into selfishness and piety. and to make matters worse, it seems the church knows they've done it. they (we?) have knowingly drawn divisive lines in the sand and said "we're over here and they are over there."

and so, whoever may be reading this, please see the hurt in the world - the poor, the rich, the hungry, the glutton, the innocent, the guilty... and see that things need to change. be thankful that love is more healing than ignorance is hurtful. be inspired by grace and love, and believe that things can return to being collaborative and unified. i know that things can be better again.

funny facebook

i was playing around with facebook this evening and got the idea to start "classifying" all my friends into the following categories:

• leander (high school)
• georgetown naz 
• minnesota
• SNU (undergrad or when i was teaching, or if you went there)
• Grad School / Life Counseling Center
• family
• brenham
• other friends (that i know via gabriele or some other connection altogether)

it was really an interesting and difficult project.  as i scrolled thru my friend list (259 of them), my memories of everyone started to blur together, and it became difficult to remember who i knew when.  it was especially difficult for people that i knew during the years i've moved (1992, 1996, 2008, and pretty much every year during college).  did i go to church and college with them?  wait...did i go to high school with them...or middle school?  or, did i know them when i was in high school but they lived somewhere else, then later we were friends again?  

a really cool tool that i've found to visually illustrate the interconnectedness of friends is the "friend wheel" on facebook.  you can see mine if you go to the 'boxes' tab on my profile.  very nifty.

the taqwacores

there was an interesting article in the ny times yesterday about the current muslim punk rock movement here in america, spawned by a book entitled the taqwacores.  i could summarize the article for you here, but it's really not that long, so i'll just let you click the link and read it for yourself.  

sit down, sit down, you're rockin' the boat

in pretty much every aspect of life, we're all concerned with people who disturb life as we know it, people who mess things up, people who "rock the boat."  we'd much rather have life be stable, still, predictable.  we want to feel like everything is under control.  

it occurred to me the other day that when you're in a boat that's moving through the water, you can feel the waves splashing against the hull.  by its very nature, a boat that's moving is a boat that's rocking.  

if it's moving, if it's bouncing through waves, if it's rocking, then that means it's moving. this is good news.  

gabriele and i were just talking last night about how life has been tumultuous lately, how it feels like we've been tossed around like a ship in a storm, and how we're ready for life to be calm and peaceful.  

i've never been in a boat that was going anywhere that didn't toss and bounce and dance at least a little along the way.  the only still boats i've been in were ones that weren't going anywhere, ones that were either tied up to the shore or floating without purpose or direction.  so it's comforting to me to think that maybe our boat has been rocking because we're on the way to somewhere, maybe on the way to somewhere nice where we can tie up our boat, get out, and enjoy the destination.  

until then, i guess we'll keep hanging on, and try to enjoy the scenery along the way.

and now for your nightly news...

my post yesterday about rogerian person-centered therapy gave rise to a couple of thoughts that i wanted to follow-up on.  in that post i said:

"sometimes i wonder what the world would look like if i heard as many sermons about loving my neighbor as i have about the sinful nature of tattoos, rock music, and sex."

i refer to this type of behavior as the "evening news phenomenon."  for decades, news programming has presented the public with information about what is going in the world, typically with a substantial slant toward topics of concern - war, economic crises, natural disasters, disease, famine, celebrity gossip, etc.  certainly important information, but when it is the only information presented as being newsworthy, something within us begins to change.  when bad news is the only news that we hear,  then bad news becomes the only news we share.  like ellen degeneres says regarding the news headline ticker that crawls across the bottom of the television screen, we really only need one crawl going around that simply says "things are getting worse."

i often see the evening news phenomenon at work when i am counseling couples and families  parents come home from work and gripe about their day, they get onto the kids for being rowdy, and everyone nags each other about whatever comes to mind.  days and weeks go by with nary a compliment or positive comment exchanged in the home.  each person starts to feel like they can't do anything right  

i also see the evening news phenomenon occurring in our churches, though admittedly it seems be happening less frequently now than it did 5 or 10 years ago.  too often we've focused more on what people are doing wrong than on what they are doing right.  while we are quick to point out faults and misdeeds, we are also slow to show grace and to forgive.  

my apologies, i realize i'm getting too preachy.  i do want to acknowledge that i have been one that was quick to judge, quick to label, quick to insult, and slow, slow, slow to show grace.  i desperately want to be an agent of love, and thank god that his grace is never slow or insufficient.

rogerian theology

i have a great deal of respect for carl rogers, the american psychologist credited with developing the person-centered approach to psychotherapy. rogers was raised in a devout christian family and he began college with at least some intent of entering the ministry. along the way, though, something in rogers' experience caused him to shift his career path away from the ministry and toward psychology.

therapists-in-training love rogerian therapy because they believe that it's a technique that's not a technique. while rogers did outline specific techniques in his description of the person-centered approach to therapy, the true benefit of his theory is its broad applicability to all therapeutic approaches. as a colleague of mine once said, "all good therapy is person-centered."

one of the best known aspects of rogers' person-centered theory is the idea and practice of "unconditional positive regard," often simply referred to as "UPR." through his research, rogers discovered that the relationship between a client and therapist has more of an impact on the client's healing than any particular therapeutic technique.

i'm convinced that rogers' theory has application beyond the field of counseling. the core tenets of his theory - empathy, unconditional positive regard, the power of relationship, genuineness -are all terms and ideas i have often heard in the church. heard, but rarely seen or felt or experienced. why is that?

i'm curious what a church would look like that actually embraced values like acceptance, empathy, and "unconditional positive regard" in their approach to ministry. they'd have to give up some things, though, like judgment and comfort. they'd have to get used to being in a boat that rocks rather than one that just quietly floats. once word got out that a church was like that, no doubt it would attract an interesting crowd. there's a lot of people who feel that the church has a closed-mind and closed-door stance regarding their decisions and/or lifestyle, and so they don't feel welcome. it's terribly sad.

i know that there are some churches that are trying to more fully embrace the practice of acceptance and empathy and unconditional positive regard, and that's wonderful. it's the fact that more churches aren't doing it that concerns me. i can't remember the last time i heard the word "persecuted" and it wasn't referring to the church.

sometimes i wonder what the world would look like if i heard as many sermons about loving my neighbor as i have about the sinful nature of tattoos, rock music, and sex. are we really more concerned with punishment than we are with helping those in need?

lottery jesus

my morning commute takes me past a billboard that displays the estimated powerball jackpot for the upcoming drawing. the sign is in a prime viewing location; it sits on top of a slight topographical rise just off the highway, and there aren’t any buildings around the billboard to distract from the view. i’ve often wondered how much the oklahoma lottery commission has to pay for such a premium advertising spot. it’s probably worth it when compared to the amount of revenue generated by the billboard. it’s a very noticeable billboard.

most days i take note of the sign and the jackpot amount. today it was $57 million, which is $7 million more than wednesday, so it appears that no one won the jackpot this week. every time i see the billboard i start to daydream about what it would be like to win. not just what i would do with the money, but what it would actually feel like to win. i imagine a warm feeling would come over my body, my breathing quicken, my hand holding the ticket would start to quiver, my cheeks would begin to burn from holding up the enormous smile on my face. it would be a glorious moment of revelation as i embraced the freedom that i assume such money would permit.

it's interesting to observe those who play the lottery. for instance, my dad only buys a ticket if the jackpot gets really big, like $150 million, as if the prospect of winning that amount somehow justifies spending a dollar for a ticket, whereas playing to win only $50 million would be a waste of money. on the other end of the spectrum, i once knew a woman who would call in to the local convience store to order her weekly lottery purchase, typically totalling around $250. many more people opt for consistently playing one or two dollars each week, rationalizing that if they buy a ticket for each drawing, then sooner or later they're bound to win, right?

i think that many people view prayer like they're playing the lottery. some only pray for really big things or when they feel like they "really need it." others may pray everyday, perhaps even because they have become habitual about "praying without ceasing," but their motivation isn't because they truly believe that their prayers will be answered; they may just believe that if the pray enough, eventually one of those prayers will be heard and be answered.

despite my agnostic leanings, every now and then i whisper a few words up to God/gods/universe/Flying Spaghetti Monster/whatever. it usually feels like i'm just throwing a hail mary (pun intended) and hoping that it gets answered. sometimes i wonder what else i should do to boost my prayer to the top of god's list - as if i could do some kind of rain dance and make god hear me. i'm afraid of being one of those people who is completely convinced that god will hear their prayers and heal their sick child, only to have the child die. there are millions of devout and holy people out there who have prayed incessantly for years without receiving the answer they were looking for.

the problem is obvious, of course: we're all looking for a particular answer from god. we want to have god wrapped around our little finger, like we're alladin and he's our genie. we want to be able to pray a certain way and have god "give in" to our big puppy dog eyes and pouty lip and give us all the desires of our heart.

the end is here

if you haven't already heard about this story, here's the link.  

basically, the crowd awaiting the black friday sales outside a walmart store in new york let their greed and impatience get the best of them.  they busted in the front doors and rushed the store, trampling a 34 year-old seasonal employee to death.  then people were mad that the police asked them to leave the store.  

seriously, folks.  things have gotten out of hand.

zap!

i first met god in the walmart parking lot in athens, texas. i was five or six years old, and was spending a few weeks visiting my grandparents. while in the store, my grandmother had offered to buy me a toy. not wanting to squander the offer on just any toy, i was taking my time looking over everything and weighing my options. characteristically patient, my grandmother eventually grew weary of my selective shopping and told me we were leaving - without a toy.

this made me cry, of course, and i began to create quite the scene. frustrated and embarrassed, my grandmother issued a quick swat to my hind quarters. i tried to hold back my tears as we exited the store, my feelings of shame prompting me to mumble "i wish i could just die." my grandmother wheeled around, caught me by the arm and said with striking conviction "don't you ever wish that, andy. god might strike you down right here in this parking lot with a bolt of lightning."

i'm probably not the only person that has spent their lives in fear of what god might do to them. growing up in the church i was practially raised on the old testament stories of god's wrath falling upon the sinful: getting kicked out of the garden of eden, the tower of babel, sodom and gomorrah, lot's wife, the flood, being exiled in egypt, spending forty years wandering in the desert - and that's just in the first two books! it's easy to teach these stories to children; the characters are easily divided between good and evil, and the plots are thick with drama. love, death, guilt. they translate directly to how we want our chlidren to conduct themselves, and usually the story even adds a little incentive. do this, don't do that...or else!

but when the story really gets good, when the climax is reached, our ability to teach seems to vanish. i mean, we're good about painting jesus as the "good guy" of the story. that part is easy; we know the end of the story, and everyone likes a winner. really, it's message that jesus brings that seems to be the difficult part. forgiveness for all, love thy neighbor, acceptance, the last shall be first - these themes are more difficult to illustrate with a flannelgraph than animals walking two-by-two.

i wonder how many of us have grown up embracing justice and vengence rather than forgiveness and mercy? how often do we find reasons to reject others instead of accepting them? how motivated are we to help, and how motivated are we to hurt? and even worse, how often have we perpetuated this faulty teaching to our own children, our own friends, our own world?

starving artist

i have placed a link in the sidebar to my new page on imagekind.com where you can purchase prints of some of gabriele's and my art.  imagekind is wonderful- you can choose what size print you want, and they have hundreds of options for the type of print surface, as well as thousands of framing and matting options.  

if you or someone you know is interested in any original work, please contact me here.  

[edit:  i'm also working on updating some of the older electronic media stuff i've done so that they look better in larger sizes.  i'll post again both here and on JOINTogether when i get that done.]

various versions of me

i've often attempted to be a hipster, though without much long-term success. i nearly always fail at being a hipster, though. it's not because at my core i'm not a hipster, but more likely because i am lazy, and achieving the hipster's effortless look is such hard work, and i never seem to know about any unknown bands worth bragging about.

in these moments of post-hipster failure weakness, i usually settle for simply being a "professional," which i suppose is appropriate seeing as i have a graduate degree and usually work in an office. in my heart, though, i feel that i am "just" being a "professional," and that i am not "being true" to "who i really am," and other phrases that necessitate the use of excessive punctuation to set them apart as important lables of distinction, even when they're not.

countering this drab exterior of being a professional usually takes the form of jeans, t-shirts, and flip-flops (or, occasionally, cowboy boots) whenever i have the chance, or more typically, whenever i can rationalize that the [closet] post-moderns in the oklahoma city are open and accepting of casual dress for nearly all occasions. i then try to pair my appearance with appropriate theme music, which could be anything from red dirt to pearl jam to frank sinatra.

today, however, i wore a suit. early this morning i sat alone in my car in the parking lot of a salvation army thrift store, sipping a starbucks house brew and listening to a staccato-voiced NPR reporter (markedly distant from any of the aforementioned theme music), my mind awash in economic and political news and dreaming of who i wanted to be when i grew up. as if i still hadn't decided on embracing the hipster, the professional, or the weekender persona, but believing that at some point i would have to choose just one, and that whatever i chose would then be "me" forever.

of course, the reality is that i am always "me," no matter how i dress or speak or act. we choose to express and portray ourselves in different ways in an effort to represent all the different facets of our personality. this behavior is fascinating, and it is one of the primary reasons i chose to study psychology rather than finance.